JEFFREY RUSSELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JEFFREY RUSSELL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
6 So. 3d 114
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
We affirm without comment Jeffrey Russell’s convictions following his no contest plea to several sexual offenses involving minors. But as properly conceded by the State, the probation imposed for counts three and four was not orally pronounced by the court at sentencing. Accordingly, we reverse and remand solely for the purpose of striking the probation on those two counts. See Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265, 1268 (Fla.2003) (holding that court’s oral pronouncement of sentence controls over discrepancy in written sentence).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
FULMER and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wallace v. State, 249 So. 3d 791 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
-
Reyes v. State, 83 So. 3d 974 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…hin certain timeframes. However, the trial court was without authority to rule upon the motion as the filing of Reyes’ notice of appeal had divested it of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a); Fla. R.App. P. 9.600(b); Liranzo-Cruzata v. State, 6 So. 3d 114, 114 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). But see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2) (expressly providing for motions during the pendency of appeal); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Further, this court had not otherwise relinquished jurisdiction. Cf. Hammond v. State, 62 So. 3d 1…
Authorities Cited
- Columbus Rickey Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 2003)