D.T. AND C.T., PARENTS OF C.G., D.T., K.T., ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
D.T. AND C.T., PARENTS OF C.G., D.T., K.T., ETC., APPELLANT,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
6 So. 3d 717
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
See G.M. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 969 So.2d 569, 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“Although Appellant raises various points regarding possible defects in the procedural posture of this case, it does not appear that any of his claims were argued below. Thus, any objections ... have been waived and are not preserved for our review.”) (citations omitted); C.W. v. Dep’t of Children and Family Servs., 944 So.2d 1197, 1199 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (noting that a trial court must be affirmed as to its factual findings when those findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence).
AFFIRMED.
PALMER, C.J., MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Fish & Wildlife Conservation Comm. v. Daws (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
Authorities Cited
- C.W. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 944 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- G.M. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 969 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)