SHARON EDELSTEIN, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF SHIRLEY A. BEAGELL, APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD BEAGELL, AS BENEFICIARY OF THE ESTATE OF SHIRLEY A. BEAGELL, APPELLEE
Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of December 11, 2008, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, entitled “Final Order on Petition for Determination of Beneficiaries,” denied the petition below without making any final determination as to the beneficiaries of the estate. Therefore, the order on appeal did not “finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person,” so as to be appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(a)(2). See Dempsey v. Dempsey, 899 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Sanchez v. Masterhan, 837 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
The appellee’s “Motion to Dismiss and/or Require Appellant to Properly Designate the Record on Appeal,” filed on January 15, 2008, as well as the “Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Initial Brief,” filed on January 29, 2009, are denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
WEBSTER, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sch. Bd. OF Hernando Cnty. v. Rhea, 213 So. 3d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…ivilege by submitting to the jurisdiction of a court outside of its home venue or by filing a motion to change venue to a court outside of its home venue. See Dep’t of Agric. v. Middleton, 24 So. 3d 624, 627 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Levy Cty. v. Diamond, 7 So. 3d 564, 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Mansfield v. Singletary, 610 So. 2d 76, 77 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. State, 295 So. 2d 314, 322-23 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). The school boards did neither here; they consistently…
-
Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund & The Fla. Dep't of Env't Prot. v. Walton Cnty., 121 So. 3d 1166 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…that government actions have ousted him from his property as effectively as if it were actually taken in a formal eminent domain action.” The case law cited by the majority opinion does not support its view. For example, in Levy County v. Diamond, 7 So. 3d 564 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), the plaintiffs asserted an inverse condemnation claim regarding land located in Levy County, but filed their suit in Leon County. The trial court refused to transfer the action to Levy County, and this court reversed, recognizin…1 / 3
Authorities Cited
- Dempsey v. Dempsey, 899 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
- Quintin Ferguson v. State, 837 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
- Sanchez v. Masterhan, 837 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)