DWAYNE M. SCOTT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court reversed revocation of community control where the State presented only hearsay evidence of a driving-with-suspended-license violation, holding that probation/community control cannot be revoked solely on hearsay.
A defendant's community control cannot be revoked solely on hearsay evidence; the State must present competent evidence of a willful and substantial violation.
[1] Probation or community control cannot be revoked solely on hearsay evidence; although hearsay is admissible in revocation proceedings, the State must present competent ev…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a defendant's probation or community control cannot be revoked solely on hearsay”
Citing Thompson v. State, the court established the rule that hearsay alone is insufficient to revoke community control.
Scott was on community control and was alleged to have driven with a suspended or revoked license on July 18, 2007, resulting in arrest by St. Petersb…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Willful And Substantial Violation cases and more on FLexlaw
Dwayne M. Scott appeals the order revoking his community control for driving with a suspended or revoked license. He contends that the trial court erred in revoking his community control where the only evidence of violation was hearsay. We agree and reverse.
The State has the burden of proving by the greater weight of the evidence that the defendant willfully and substantially violated a specific condition of his probation or community control. Brown v. State, 813 So.2d 202, 204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Although hearsay evidence is admissible during a revocation proceeding, a defendant’s probation or community control cannot be revoked solely on hearsay. Thompson v. State, 890 So.2d 382, 383 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Here, the affidavit of violation alleged that Scott committed a new law violation by driving with a suspended or revoked license “as evidenced by his arrest by St. Petersburg Police Department on 7-18-07.” However, at the revocation hearing, the only evidence the State presented to substantiate the violation was the hearsay testimony of Scott’s community control officer that a coworker had seen Scott driving. Neither the individual who allegedly witnessed Scott driving nor the officer who arrested him was called to testify. Because the State relied solely on hearsay to establish that Scott violated his community control, we reverse the revocation order and remand for reinstatement of Scott to community control.
Reversed and remanded.
SILBERMAN and LaROSE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Brown v. State, 813 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- Thompson v. State, 890 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)