RALPH FAYSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2009-06-04
No. 1D09-2247
BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
10 So. 3d 709 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(B).

BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Students FOR Online Voting v. MacHen, 24 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
    …t of Banking and Fin., 362 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The petitioners’ appeal from that order was previously dismissed because the order had not been rendered. Students for Online Voting v. Student Gov’t of the Student Body of the Univ. of Fla., 10 So. 3d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Having considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response thereto, we find that petitioners are entitled to relief. See Tucker v. Ruvin, 748 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Respondent argues in op [*1274] position to t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw