TECHNOLOGY FOR COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, APPELLANT,
v.
TARAFA CONSTRUCTION, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2009-05-06
No. 3D09-213
Before GERSTEN, C.J., and CORTINAS and SALTER, JJ.
10 So. 3d 1131 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court erred in finding that appellant waived its right to arbitrate, see Carnival Corp. v. Booth, 946 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), we need not address this issue because we find the modification agreement, and the arbitration provision contained therein, to be unenforceable.

Remanded with instructions.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Manning, 121 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
    …ms of erroneous court instructions and ineffective assistance of counsel. See, e.g., Conionilli v. State, 58 So. 3d 380 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (holding that appellant’s claim based on misadvice of counsel was time barred under 3.850); Sampedro v. State, 10 So. 3d 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (time limitations of 3.850 apply to claims that trial court failed to give proper instructions regarding possibility of deportation). Manning’s case is no different. Hall v. State, 94 So. 3d 655, 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“[S]imply…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw