SURVIVORS CHARTER SCHOOLS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2009-07-08
Nos. 4D06-2378, 4D06-2379
FARMER, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
12 So. 3d 324 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2009)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

On remand from the Florida Supreme Court, the Fourth District Court of Appeal addressed claims previously unaddressed regarding the School Board's termination of Survivors Charter Schools' charters. The court found the remaining claims either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit, and affirmed the School Board's termination decision.


Holding

The court affirmed the School Board's termination decision, finding that claims regarding hearsay, failure to notice the January 25 meeting, improper termination procedures, and separate consideration of the two schools were either not preserved for appellate review or, if preserved, without merit.


Headnotes

[1] A claim is not preserved for appellate review if no objection was made on that ground at the hearing.

[2] A school board's decision to terminate a charter school's charter will be affirmed if the claims raised on appeal are either not preserved or are without merit.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the Supreme Court of Florida reversed our decision and remanded for us to address the other claims raised on appeal but not addressed in our opinion”

Establishes the procedural posture on remand and the scope of review required

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The School Board of Palm Beach County terminated the charters of Survivors Charter Schools. The School Board relied on an audit report and took action…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*325 ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PER CURIAM.

In School Board of Palm Beach County, Florida v. Survivors Charter Schools, Inc., 3 So.3d 1220 (Fla.2009), the Supreme Court of Florida reversed our decision and remanded for us to address the other claims raised on appeal but not addressed in our opinion. As identified by the Supreme Court, the pertinent claims that were not addressed are summarized as follows:

the school board should not have relied on the audit report because it is hearsay; [2] the failure to properly notice the January 25 meeting or to find a need for immediate action at that meeting violated due process; [3] the School Board never initiated a proper action for termination because the Superintendent failed to file a petition for termination giving Survivors an opportunity to know the charges and appropriately respond; [4] the termination cannot be upheld because there was no evidence submitted and no good cause shown; [5] the audit report was not competent, substantial evidence or a legally sufficient reason for termination; [6] the charters and statute required the School Board to commence alternative dispute resolution before terminating the charters; [7] and the School Board failed to consider Survivors WPB and Survivors BB separately.

Sch. Bd. of Palm Beach County, 3 So.3d at 1237 n. 15.

After reviewing the other claims raised by the appellant, we find that they were either not preserved or are without merit. As to claims numbered one, two, three, and seven, we find that they were not preserved for appellate review because no objection was made on those grounds at the hearing. Even if preserved, we find no merit to any of the claims. We therefore affirm.

FARMER, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw