MATTHEW MICHAEL RAMSEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2009-06-24
No. 1D08-4263
WOLF, KAHN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
12 So. 3d 883 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court erred in finding a probation violation without sufficient evidence of the appellant's ability to pay.


Facts & Procedural History

The appellant was found in violation of probation for failing to pay fines and fees totaling over $5,000, having paid only $800. He argued he lacked t…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant is serving probation for animal cruelty. A condition of probation is that he pay fines and fees totaling over $5,000. Over the course of his probation, the appellant has paid only a single payment of $800. He is here seeking review of an order finding him in violation of his probation for failing to make monthly payments. He argues that the trial court failed to establish he had the ability to pay the fines and fees required by his probation.

The appellant has an eighth-grade education and no G.E.D. He drives a logging truck, earning approximately $1200 each month. All of his income supports the needs of appellant and his two children.

The State must prove appellant had the ability to pay and that he willfully violated his probation. See Smith v. State, 892 So.2d 513 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); see also Davis v. State, 704 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The trial court found that appellant somehow could have found a way to make the payments, but those findings are speculative. There is no record evidence upon which the trial court could have found that appellant had the ability to make his monthly payments or that he willfully violated his probation.

REVERSED.

WOLF, KAHN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw