ROBERT JAMES BRIM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2009-07-17
No. 2D08-2106
FULMER, DAVIS, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
12 So. 3d 923 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Robert James Brim appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction DNA testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. We affirm the denial without prejudice to any right Brim may have to raise a claim of bad faith destruction of the evidence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Moore v. State, 903 So.2d 238, 239-40 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

FULMER, DAVIS, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Canseco v. State, 52 So. 3d 575 (Fla. 2010)
    …PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Canseco v. State, 12 So. 3d 923 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). In its decision, the district court ruled upon the following question, which the court certified to be of great public importance: WHETHER A DEFENDANT MAY OBTAIN THE BENEFIT OF A NEW TWO-YEAR WINDOW PERIOD UNDER STATE V. GREEN,…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw