STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
K.R.G., APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2009-07-08
No. 2D08-1260
Khouzam, J., LaRose, J., Crenshaw, J.
12 So. 3d 1269 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida appellate court reversed a juvenile disposition order that withheld adjudication for drug possession because the trial court failed to comply with the mandatory statutory requirement to revoke or withhold the juvenile's driver's license for 6 months to 1 year under Fla. Stat. § 322.056(l)(a)(1).


Holding

A juvenile court lacks discretion to withhold compliance with the mandatory driver's license revocation requirement under Fla. Stat. § 322.056(l)(a)(1) when adjudicating a first-time drug possession violation, even when adjudication is withheld.


Headnotes

[1] A juvenile court must comply with the mandatory driver's license revocation requirements of Fla. …

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

K.R.G. committed a delinquent act of drug possession on December 7, 2007. The juvenile court withheld adjudication, placed K.R.G. on probation, but de…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
KHOUZAM, Judge.

KHOUZAM, Judge.

The State appeals a disposition order in which adjudication was withheld for a delinquent act that was committed by K.R.G. on December 7, 2007. The State correctly asserts that the disposition was illegal because the juvenile court refused to comply with the statutory requirements concerning the revocation of K.R.G.’s driver’s license. See State v. S.S., 8 So.3d 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). The juvenile court did not have discretion to forego the dictates of section 322.056(l)(a)(l), Florida Statutes (2007), which required it to direct the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to revoke or to withhold issuance of KR.G.’s driver’s license or driving privilege for a period of “[n]ot less than 6 months and not more than 1 year” on her first-time violation of chapter 893. In S.S., as in this case, the juvenile committed the delinquent act of marijuana possession in violation of the 2007 statutes, and the juvenile court withheld adjudication, placed the juvenile on probation, and declined to comply with the mandatory provisions of section 322.056(l)(a)(l). As in S.S., the court was required to comply with the statute. Accordingly, we reverse the disposition or*1270der and remand the matter to the juvenile court for the entry of an order directed to the Department as required by section 322.056(l)(a)(l).

Reversed and remanded.

LaROSE and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • M.A.R. v. State, 67 So. 3d 232 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
    …ction 806.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2003), does not apply to juveniles because it provides for the imposition of a fíne “only on those individuals who have been ‘convicted’ ” and “juveniles are not deemed to be ‘convicted’”); with State v. K.R.G., 12 So. 3d 1269, 1269 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (applying to juvenile proceedings section 322.056(1)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (2007), which requires revocation of the driver’s license of a person under 18 years of age who is found guilty of or delinquent for certain crimes…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw