BRANDON CHRISTOPHER MILLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court had jurisdiction to revoke probation for aggravated assault but lacked jurisdiction to revoke probation for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon because the probationary period had expired.
Miller pleaded no contest to aggravated assault and improper exhibition, receiving probation. An affidavit alleging probation violation was filed afte…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Improper Exhibition Of A Dangerous Weapon cases and more on FLexlaw
In this appeal, Brandon Christopher Miller challenges the revocation of his probation and the judgments and sentences imposed upon revocation. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
On May 9, 2006, Miller pleaded no contest to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon. The trial court withheld adjudication and placed Miller on three years’ probation for aggravated assault and a concurrent term of one year’s probation for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon. On November 9, 2007, an affidavit was filed alleging that Miller had violated his probation. The trial court found that Miller violated his probation and sentenced him to thirty months’ imprisonment. Although the court indicated orally that the probation revocation proceeding only applied to the aggravated assault offense, the written judgments and sentences entered upon the revocation reflect that Miller’s probation was revoked on both offenses and that he was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to two concurrent terms of imprisonment for thirty months.
We affirm the revocation of probation and the resulting judgment and sentence for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. However, the State correctly concedes that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke Miller’s probation on the improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon offense because the one-year probationary period had expired prior to the commencement of the revocation proceeding. Accordingly, we reverse the revocation of probation and the resulting judgment and sentence for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon. See Marshall v. State, 934 So.2d 665, 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). On remand, the trial court shall enter a written revocation order consistent with this opinion.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Barksdale v. State, 66 So. 3d 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…edes that appellant had served the maximum probationary term on the battery charge before the filing of the probation violation affidavit, depriving the trial court of jurisdiction to revoke appellant’s probation on that charge. See Miller v. State, 13 So. 3d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); McAvoy v. State, 760 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse the revocation of appellant’s probation for battery in case number 2007-CF-2931 and remand with directions that the trial court vacate the revocation o…
Authorities Cited
- Thaddeus Hannah v. State, 934 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)