EFFINEY HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2009-07-01
No. 3D08-1188
Before COPE, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.
13 So. 3d 1088 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Effiney Harris appeals his convictions for attempted second-degree murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We conclude that the trial court’s denial of the motion for mistrial was within its discretion. See Villanueva v. State, 917 So.2d 968, 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

The State concedes that the judgment on count one must be corrected. On May 9, 2008, the trial court entered an order correcting the judgment and stating that defendant-appellant Harris was convicted under subsection 782.04(3), Florida Statutes (2006). However, the State acknowledges that the correct reference is subsection 782.04(2), Florida Statutes (2006). We therefore remand for correction of the statute number.

Affirmed; remanded for correction of judgment.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Montez v. State, 228 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
    …, has been contaminated, or such other findings in respect to the tested evidence as the circuit court determines to be appropriate” (quoting Swafford v. State, 871 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 2004) (table report of unpublished order))); cf. Espinoza v. State, 13 So. 3d 1088, 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (discussing Swafford and indicating that where the defendant raises “some specific claim regarding possible contamination of the DNA samples,” the reviewing court may remand the case to the postconvietion court to determine…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw