ROOSEVELT RUDY PERRY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2009-07-22
No. 3D09-1458
Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and COPE and WELLS, JJ.
13 So. 3d 1112 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Flores v. State, 745 So.2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Holmes v. State, 650 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2005).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Morgan v. State, 47 So. 3d 904 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Mercado v. State, 13 So. 3d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).…
  • McCLEESE v. State, 94 So. 3d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Shiflet v. State, 50 So. 3d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Mercado v. State, 13 So. 3d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw