ARTHUR D. LAKE, APPELLANT,
v.
ZEITA VERONICA LAKE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that an order entered by a judge after recusal is void.
Following a dissolution of marriage, a dispute arose over a marital settlement agreement. The husband moved to disqualify the judge, which was granted…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Void Order cases and more on FLexlaw
Confession of Error
Arthur D. Lake appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage as well as an order awarding his former wife attorneys fees and costs. Based on the former husband’s failure to file a conformed copy of the final judgment and our subsequent dismissal of the appeal as to that judgment, we are left to consider only the order awarding fees and costs. On our independent review of the record, as well as the former wife’s confession of error, we reverse the fee order and remand for further proceedings.
The parties entered into a marital settlement agreement which was incorporated into a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. When a post-judgment dispute arose over each party’s responsibilities under the final judgment, the former wife moved to enforce the final judgment. Citing the trial judge’s conduct during the hearing held on the matter, the former husband filed a motion to disqualify. This motion was granted, and the trial judge recused himself. Thereafter the same judge entered an order awarding attorneys fees and costs to the former wife’s counsel.
Once the trial judge recused himself, he had no further authority to enter orders. See Bolt v. Smith, 594 So.2d 864, 864 (Fla. *2855th DCA 1992) (“Florida case law is well settled that once a trial judge has recused himself, further orders of the recused judge are void and have no effect.”).
On this authority and the former wife’s confession of error, we reverse the fee order and remand for further proceedings before a successor judge.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Richard Plaza v. Marie Plaza, 21 So. 3d 181 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…e issued the order holding the father in contempt, which is the subject of this Court’s review. As a general rule, once an order disqualifying a judge is entered, the judge is prohibited from any further participation in the case. See Lake v. Lake, 14 So. 3d 284, 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (reversing an order issued by the same judge who issued the instant order after the judge had recused himself, finding that “[o]nce the trial judge recused himself, he had no further authority to enter orders”); Colla-do v. C…
Authorities Cited
- Richard A. Bolt, M.D. v. Smith, 594 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)