EUGENE V. ROSS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Illegal Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellant filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), claiming that the trial court sentenced him illegally when it sentenced him under the 1983 sentencing guidelines, adopted by the Florida Supreme Court, before the Florida legislature adopted them on July 1, 1984. See Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989); Wright v. State, 941 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
Because the appellant’s motion raises a facially sufficient claim that is not refuted by the record, we reverse and remand for attachment of record portions showing that the appellant’s claim has been addressed on the merits, attachment of record portions showing that the appellant affirmatively elected to be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines, or resentencing.
REVERSED.
KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cummings v. State, 106 So. 3d 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…r the appellant to be resentenced. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach the portion of the record conclusively refuting the appellant’s claim, or for the court to resen-tence the appellant. See, e.g., Ross v. State, 14 So. 3d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). REVERSED AND REMANDED. ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Alphonso P. Smith v. State, 537 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 1989)
- Wright v. State, 941 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)