A.W., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Costs Of Prosecution cases and more on FLexlaw
A.W., a juvenile adjudicated delinquent for possession of cocaine, contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for dismissal at the conclusion of the evidence portion of the trial. As to that issue, we affirm without further discussion.
A.W. also contends that the trial court erred in imposing costs of prosecution pursuant to section 938.29, Florida Statutes (2009), in the amount of $150. We agree. It is clear that section 938.29 does not authorize the imposition of costs of prosecution in delinquency cases, and the State concedes that imposition of these costs is error.
Accordingly, the order of delinquency is affirmed. That part of the order assessing the costs of prosecution is reversed.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
MONACO, C.J. and COHEN, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Rand, 209 So. 3d 660 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…). “Probable cause for arrest exists when the totality of the facts and circumstances within an officer’s knowledge would cause a reasonable person to believe that an offense has been [*670] committed by the person being arrested.” Hatcher v. State, 15 So. 3d 929, 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (emphasis added) (citing Chavez v. State, 832 So. 2d 730, 747 (Fla. 2002)). (6) Officer Jackson’s Knowledge and Perspective. Defendant’s subjective belief about the legality of his actions is irrelevant to probable cause a…
-
Hughes v. State, 132 So. 3d 933 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…at the arrestee committed a crime. State v. Cuomo, 43 So. 3d 838, 841 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). The existence of probable cause is not based on a formulaic determination, but rather on the probability of criminal activity. Id.; see also Hatcher v. State, 15 So. 3d 929, 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (noting that probable cause exists when the totality of the facts and circumstances within an officer’s knowledge would cause a reasonable person to believe that an offense has been committed by the person being arrested).…
-
State v. A.E., 34 So. 3d 143 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Hatcher v. State, 15 So. 3d 929 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Tarver v. State, 961 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Green v. State, 831 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); McGowan v. State, 778 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Bell v. State, 792 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Edwards v. State, 5…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence