MELISSA WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2009-08-12
No. 1D07-5192
KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
15 So. 3d 933 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this criminal appeal, we affirm the conviction. Appellant, however, correctly asserts that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter a restitution order after appellant filed a notice of appeal as to the judgment and sentence. See Horan v. State, 990 So.2d 1264, 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Williams v. State, 952 So.2d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Brantley v. State, 723 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (noting the State conceded that filing the notice of appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to set the amount of restitution); Nguyen v. State, 655 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Pursuant to Brantley, Williams, Horan, and Nguyen, upon the return of jurisdiction to the trial court, that court may conduct another restitution hearing and rule in accordance with the evidence presented.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hime v. State, 219 So. 3d 935 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
    …AM. We affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, because Appellant filed her notice of appeal before the trial court entered its restitution order, that order was entered without jurisdiction, and we must reverse. See Williams v. State, 15 So. 3d 933 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (holding that a trial court is divested of jurisdiction to enter a restitution order once a noticé of appeal has been filed). On remand, the trial court may conduct a new restitution hearing and enter a new order should it choose…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw