FRANK N. TROVATO, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCES M. TROVATO N/K/A FRANCES LINDEN, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Frank Trovato appeals a trial court order modifying his alimony obligation and imposing discovery sanctions in the form of attorney's fees. The court affirmed the alimony modification and the decision to impose sanctions, but reversed the specific fee award because the appellee failed to present sufficient evidence supporting the reasonableness and amount of the fees awarded.
The court affirmed the decision to impose sanctions in the form of attorney's fees pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380, but reversed the specific award of $3,500 in fees because Mrs. Linden failed to produce adequate evidence supporting the reasonableness of the amount, and the trial court failed to make findings regarding hours reasonably expended and used an unsupported hourly rate.
[1] An award of attorney's fees must be supported by substantial competent evidence, including express findings regarding the number of hours reasonably expended and a reason…
[2] Attorney's fees awarded as a discovery sanction must be supported by evidence demonstrating the reasonableness of the amount and that the fees resulted from the non-compl…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“An award of attorney's fees must be supported by substantial competent evidence and contain express findings regarding the number of hours reasonably expended and a reasonable hourly rate for the type of litigation involved.”
Establishes the legal standard for awarding attorney's fees in discovery sanctions cases.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFrank Trovato was ordered to modify his alimony obligation to Frances Linden (n/k/a Frances M. Trovato). Trovato failed to comply with discovery order…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Hours Reasonably Expended cases and more on FLexlaw
Frank Trovato timely appeals the trial court’s order modifying his alimony obligation to Frances Linden and the imposition of sanctions on him for his failure to comply with discovery orders. We affirm the alimony modification without further discussion. We also affirm the trial court’s decision to impose sanctions on Mr. Trovato in the form of attorney’s fees, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380. Nonetheless, we reverse that portion of the order imposing sanctions on Mr. Trovato because Mrs. Linden did not produce evidence to support the reasonableness of the amount of fees awarded by the court.
“An award of attorney’s fees must be supported by substantial competent evidence and contain express findings regarding the number of hours reasonably expended and a reasonable hourly rate for the type of litigation involved.” Tutor Time Merger Corp. v. MeCabe, 763 So.2d 505, 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (noting that this requirement also applies to fees awarded as a discovery sanction). With the exception of Mrs. Linden’s attorney’s statement that he billed Mrs. Linden $3,500 in connection with Mr. Trovato’s discovery violations, there is no evidence on the record to show that the amount of attorney’s fees is reasonable or that the fees resulted from Mr. Trovato’s failure to comply with discovery orders. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.380(b)(2) (indicating that the trial court shall order the non-complying party to pay the reasonable expenses caused by the failure to comply). Furthermore, the tidal court did not make any findings of *292fact regarding the number of hours that Mrs. Linden’s attorney reasonably expended in connection with this matter. Finally, despite Mrs. Linden’s attorney’s testimony that his firm billed $135 per hour for paralegal time, the trial court found that the paralegal hourly rate was $150. This finding is not supported by the record.
Accordingly, we reverse the portion of the order requiring Mr. Trovato to pay $3,500 in attorney’s fees and remand only for Mrs. Linden to produce evidence that the fees are reasonable and resulted from Mr. Trovato’s failure to comply with the trial court’s discovery orders.
Affirmed in part; Reversed in pari and remanded.
DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carlton Fields Jorden Burt v. SP Healthcare Holdings, LLC, 163 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…on it imposed. We reverse and remand for the court to conduct a hearing to allow CFJB to be heard on the sanction and to take evidence concerning Holdings’ reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the protective order. See Trovato v. Trovato, 16 So. 3d 290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Reversed and remanded. LaROSE and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.…
-
EL Brazo Fuerte Bakery 2 v. 24 Hour AIR Serv., Inc., 330 So. 3d 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)
Authorities Cited
- Tutor Time Merger Corp. v. MeCABE, 763 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)