DEREK GINLOCK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DEREK GINLOCK, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
16 So. 3d 841
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. Perkins v. State, 682 So.2d 1083 (Fla.1996); Munoz v. State, 937 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
GRIFFIN, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pineiro v. Am. Express Card Servs. Co., Barry S. Franklin & Assocs., P.A., 105 So. 3d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…trol Prods. of N. Fla., Inc., 788 So. 2d 1013, 1016 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); see also Corbin v. St. Lucie River Co., 78 So. 2d 396, 397 (Fla.1955)(stating that the statutory requirements of garnishment “must be strictly complied with”); Zivitz v. Zivitz, 16 So. 3d 841, 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (indicating that “strict adherence” to the provisions of the garnishment statute is required). Section 77.01, Florida Statutes (2010), states that “[e]very person or entity who ... has recovered [a] judgment in any court aga…
-
Doria v. Garrison, 53 So. 3d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Zivitz v. Zivitz, 16 So. 3d 841 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). MAY, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.…
-
Lane v. Cunniffe, 174 So. 3d 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…o raise grounds authorized under rule 1.540(b). None of the evidence identified in the motion was “newly discovered” within the meaning of rule 1.540(b)(2). See Balmoral Condo. Ass’n v. Grimaldi, 107 So. 3d 1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013); Zivitz v. Zivitz, 16 So. 3d 841 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Herskowitz v. Herskowitz, 513 So. 2d 1318, 1319 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). CIKLIN, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Houston D. Perkins v. State, 682 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1996)
- Carter v. State, 937 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
- Munoz v. State, 937 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)