ARNOLD BUEHL, APPELLANT,

v.

PIROSKA BUEHL, N/K/A PIROSKA CHRISTOPHER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Design Home Remodeling Corp. v. Santana, 146 So. 3d 129 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
  …nexorably to an affirmance of the trial court’s order. Affirmed. . The American Rule states "that each party, including the successful one, in litigation must ordinarily bear the burden of his own attorneys’ fees.” General Motors Corp. v. Sanchez, 16 So. 3d 883, 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). . Section 768.79(2)(a) requires that an offer of judgment or demand for judgment ”[b]e in writing and state that it is being made pursuant to this section.” Rule 1.442(c)(1) provides: "A proposal shall be in writing and sha…
• Gen. Motors LLC v. Bowie, 58 So. 3d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …hapter 681. Id. at 941 (emphasis added) (citation omitted). The Third District Court of Appeal has similarly held that “damages” in section 681.112(1) do not envision attorney’s fees incurred in Lemon Law arbitration. Gen. Motors Corp. v. Sanchez, 16 So. 3d 883, 884-85 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). As Judge Schwartz wrote, “[it is] well established in Florida, which fully endorses the so-called American Rule on the question, that each party, including the successful one, in litigation must ordinarily bear the burden…
• Case v. Gen. Motors Corp., 19 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
  …uit court applied the correct law when it affirmed the portion of the county court’s order finding that Petitioner was not statutorily entitled to receive attorney’s fees for representation during Lemon Law arbitration. Gen. Motors Corp. v. Sanchez, 16 So. 3d 883 (Fla. 3d DC A 2009). However, the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law when it affirmed those portions of the county court’s order finding that Petitioner failed to allege a violation of chapter 681 in his complaint. Gel…

Authorities Cited

• Gibson v. Bennett, 561 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 1990)