RICHARD O'BARRY, PETITIONER,
v.
OCEAN WORLD, S.A., EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, DIANA REISS, EMORY UNIVERSITY, AND LORI MARINO, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in compelling personal financial discovery because the causes of action alleged did not support such requests, as O'Barry was not alleged to have gained financially.
[1] A party seeking personal financial discovery must allege that the opposing party gained financially from the alleged interference with business relationships.
[2] Personal financial discovery is not discoverable when the underlying causes of action do not allege financial gain by the defendant.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOcean World sued O'Barry and others for interfering with its contracts and business relationships. The trial court granted Ocean World's motion to com…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Compelled Discovery cases and more on FLexlaw
Richard O’Barry seeks certiorari review of orders that compel him to produce personal financial discovery. We grant the *1287petition and quash the order that granted Ocean World’s Motion to Compel. Friedman v. Heart Inst. of Port St. Lucie, Inc., 863 So.2d 189, 194 (Fla.2003); Carter v. Carter, 3 So.3d 397 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); In re Estate of Sauey, 869 So.2d 664 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).
Ocean World has sued O’Barry and others. The claim is that the many defendants, in various ways, interfered with Ocean World’s contract for the purchase of dolphins from Japan for delivery to its amusement park in the Dominican Republic, its contract with the Taiji Whale Museum in Japan, and its business relationship with the Dominican Republic government.1 There are three counts directed to O’Barry, each alleging intentional interference with a contractual relationship between Ocean World and the Taiji Whale Museum, Dr. Michael Briggs, and the Dominican Republic.
Of the discovery requested from O’Barry, four requests are the subject of this petition. Each request concerns personal financial discovery including personal tax returns, pay receipts, financial statements, and banking records. Over O’Barry’s objections, the trial court granted Ocean World’s Motion to Compel.
We grant O’Barry’s petition upon concluding that the causes of action do not support the request for the financial discovery. Specifically, the allegations directed toward O’Barry do not allege that he gained financially as a result of his alleged interference with the various business relationships. S. Bell Tel. and Tel. Co. v. Roper, 482 So.2d 538, 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). We also reject Ocean World’s position that the discovery is needed to counter O’Barry’s “first amendment” defenses.
Accordingly, the petition is granted and the order directing discovery is quashed.
GROSS, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Diaz-Verson v. Walbridge Aldinger Co., 54 So. 3d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
Authorities Cited
- Kenneth Friedman, M.D. v. Heart Inst. OF Port ST. Lucie, Inc., 863 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2003)
- The Trs. OF Columbia Univ. IN the City OF NEW York v. Ocean World, S.A., 12 So. 3d 788 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
- S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Roper, 482 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- In re Est. OF Norman O. Sauey, Sr. v. Sauey, 869 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
- Carter v. Kerrie S. Carter, 3 So. 3d 397 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
- Diana Reiss, Ph.D. v. Ocean World, S.A., 11 So. 3d 404 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)