MARVIN EUGENE WATTS, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Avco Corp. & Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Div. v. Neff, 30 So. 3d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …meet the irreparable harm test. We have repeatedly declined to grant cer-tiorari review to orders that petitioners claim will cause irreparable harm due to payment of unnecessary litigation and defense expenses. W. Fla. Reg’l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. See, 18 So. 3d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); United Life Ins. Co. v. lowers, 118 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). We recognize, however, that when a statute provides immunity from suit, certiorari review of a non-final order denying such immunity is appropriate. See Seminole…
• Baldwin v. Shands Teaching Hosp. & Clinics, Inc., 45 So. 3d 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …e, intentional misconduct, and any other act, neglect, or default of a health care facility or health care provider that caused or could have caused injury to ... a patient.” Art. X, § 25(c)(3), Fla. Const.; see W. Fla. Reg’l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. See, 18 So. 3d 676, 690 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), rev. granted, Case No. SC09-1997 (Fla. Mar. 29, 2010). Accordingly, “[W]e interpret the phrase ‘adverse medical incident’ as a specific incident involving a specific patient that caused or could have caused injury to or the…
• Cruz v. Cooperativa de Seguros Multiples de Puerto RICO, Inc., 76 So. 3d 394 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
  …ctional prerequisite to reviewing the merits of the certiorari petition, we must determine whether the Homeowners have demonstrated irreparable harm. See Jaye, 720 So. 2d at 215; Parkway Bank, 658 So. 2d at 649; W. Fla. Reg’l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. See, 18 So. 3d 676, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Absent irreparable harm, we should dismiss the petition. See Jaye, 720 So. 2d at 215. The Homeowners argue that by extending the period to complete neutral evaluation, the trial court denied them access to the courts. The a…