JIMMY HARRISON, APPELLANT,

v.

CORONET INDUSTRIES, INC., AND UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• S.G. v. State, 26 So. 3d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …A.R. and recited above. Accordingly, we must reverse the placement and remand for further proceedings. If the court again chooses to depart from the DJJ’s recommended placement level, it must make the findings prescribed in E.A.R. See N.P. v. State, 18 So. 3d 735, 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). We also question whether the circuit court’s previously stated reason for the departure—that S.G.’s failure to comply with preplacement detention demonstrated his need for a more restrictive placement than the DJJ’s recomme…
• J.H. v. State, 100 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
  …State, 26 So. 3d 725, 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (quoting E.A.R., 4 So. 3d at 638). “[T]he ‘needs of the child’ must be the focal point for the court when it is assessing where along the restrictiveness spectrum a child should be placed.” N.P. v. State, 18 So. 3d 735, 737 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). To deviate from the DJJ’s recommendation, the trial court must identify “significant information that the DJJ has overlooked, failed to sufficiently consider, or misconstrued with regard to the child’s programmatic, rehabil…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• L.A.G. v. State, 58 So. 3d 393 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
  …ror. Because the juvenile court departed upward from the DJJ’s recommended disposition without providing adequate reasons for the restrictiveness level imposed, we reverse the disposition. See E.A.R. v. State, 4 So. 3d 614 (Fla.2009); N.P. v. State, 18 So. 3d 735 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). We affirm the adjudication of delinquency. The reasons offered by the juvenile court for departing upward from the DJJ’s recommendation focused on the nature of the charges against L.A.G. As this court has previously explained,…