OSMEL FERNANDEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2009-09-30
No. 3D09-1181
Before RAMIREZ, SUAREZ, and CORTINAS, JJ.
18 So. 3d 1200 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

*1201Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Orientus Werner v. State, 31 So. 3d 916 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
    …of the record which demonstrate that such relief has already been granted. Mendoza v. State, 20 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); George v. State, 19 So. 3d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Taylor v. State, 19 So. 3d 420 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Fernandez v. State, 18 So. 3d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). Reversed and remanded.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw