CHRISTOPHER M. COREY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendant's claims regarding competency hearings and ineffective assistance of counsel were legally sufficient and unrefuted by the record.
The defendant appealed the trial court's summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court did not provide reasons or attach re…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Competency Hearing cases and more on FLexlaw
The defendant appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief. The trial court did not explain its summary denial or attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the defendant’s claims.
We agree with the defendant that his second and third claims (that the trial court should have held another competency hearing before or during trial and that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to move for such a hearing), are both legally sufficient and unrefuted by the summary record on appeal (including the portions of the trial transcript attached to the state’s response below, which we have reviewed in their entirety). We find the defendant’s other claims to be without merit.
We thus reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach additional portions of the record conclusively refuting claims two and three or hold an evidentia-ry hearing on those claims. See Louis v. State, 948 So.2d 869, 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).
GROSS, C.J., POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
D.P. "Rick" Wood v. Unknown Personal Representative OF the Estate OF Samuel E. Burnette and Sharon K. Burnette, 56 So. 3d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…terest. However, the court never determined the date payment was due. Because there is conflicting evidence regarding this date, we reverse and remand for the trial court to resolve this issue from the evidence before it. See, e.g., Carey v. Rocke, 18 So. 3d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (reversing and remanding for further proceedings because the resolution of the ap [*77] peal “necessarily requires factual determinations in this case”). Reversed and remanded. NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ„ Concur. . At tri…
-
In re Est. OF Va. E. Murphy. Jacqueline Rocke v. Am. Research Bureau, 184 So. 3d 1221 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…DuBois appealed the Order on Objection, and Ms. Rocke filed a cross-appeal, arguing that the probate court should have effectuated her residuary devise in the February 1992 will under the doctrine of dependent relative revocation. In Carey v. Rocke, 18 So. 3d 1266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), this court affirmed the probate court’s determinations in every regard, except its. decision to administer the residue of Mrs.- Murphy’s estate through intestacy. As to the residuary disposition, we pointed the, probate court’s a…
Authorities Cited
- Dieurold Louis v. State, 948 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)