DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, APPELLANT,
v.
PILGRIM HALL, LLC, APPELLEE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, APPELLANT,
PILGRIM HALL, LLC, APPELLEE
19 So. 3d 335
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2009)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Florida Department of Revenue appeals a summary final judgment in favor of Pilgrim Hall, LLC. This case was heard along with two consolidated appeals, Department of Revenue v. Pinellas VP, LLC, and Department of Revenue v. TP A Investments, LLC, which this court reversed. 3 So.2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). The dispositive legal issue is the same in all three appeals. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in Pinellas VP, we reverse.
Reversed.
NORTHCUTT, C.J., and CASANUEVA and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Special v. Ivo Baux, M.D., 79 So. 3d 755 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…Jones v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 871 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Blackmon, 754 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Katos v. Cushing, 601 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). . See In re Commitment of DeBolt, 19 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Esaw v. Esaw, 965 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Fla. Inst. for Neurological Rehab., Inc. v. Marshall, 943 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Damico v. Lundberg, 379 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) (citing Stecher) (on rehearing). .…
-
Alton Roosevelt v. State, 42 So. 3d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…from the children. She also stated that after she served as guardian ad litem in this particular case, the same State of Washington judge appointed her to be guardian ad litem in other cases. . The concurrence relies on In re: Commitment of DeBoit, 19 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). That case, however, was decided under sections 90.609 and 90.610, Florida Statutes. Tanzi, on the other hand, was decided under section 90.608, Florida Statutes, which was the section involved here. . The expert testified that t…1 / 2
-
Webster v. Body Dynamics, Inc., 27 So. 3d 805 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…cases. Reversal is unwarranted in a civil case unless the appellant demonstrates that “it is reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appellant would have been reached if the error had not been committed.” In re Commitment of DeBolt, 19 So. 3d 335, 337 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (quoting Damico v. Lundberg, 379 So. 2d 964, 965 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)). Any error here in precluding Dr. Parisian’s testifying to the fact the FDA banned dietary supplements containing ephedrine was harmless on at least two bas…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence