MARTHA L. MIRANDA, APPELLANT,
v.
REINEIO ORTEGA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that most arguments were untimely and that no abuse of discretion occurred regarding the remaining challenged postjudgment orders.
The former wife appealed several orders from matrimonial proceedings, including the final judgment and postjudgment orders. The notice of appeal was u…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Modification Of Visitation cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal of orders entered in matrimonial proceedings. Most of the appellant former wife’s arguments claim error in the final judgment. However, the notice of appeal is untimely with regard to the final judgment, the order on the former husband’s motion for rehearing, and the former wife’s emergency motion to vacate. We therefore do not consider the former wife’s arguments related to the final judgment and the just-mentioned orders.
The former wife has appealed several postjudgment orders. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(4). With regard to the former wife’s motion to modify visitation, the trial court denied the motion without prejudice to the former wife to file a supplemental petition to modify visitation. This ruling allows the former wife to file a supplemental petition on Florida Family Law Form 12.905(a) if she chooses to do so.
We see no abuse of discretion in the remaining orders that the former wife challenges See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.