RICHARD N. DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ON BEHALF OF THERESA DAVIS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2009-09-23
No. 3D08-2621
Before CORTIÑAS and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
19 So. 3d 421 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Macias v. Dep’t of Revenue, 16 So.3d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Conlan v. Conlan, 43 So. 3d 931 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
    …ded that Husband earns $40,000 per month in income, while income to Wife, based on imputed income, investments, and permanent alimony, is roughly $8,000. Therefore, Husband makes far more than what Wife will bring in each month. In Cooper v. Cooper, 19 So. 3d 421, [*935] 423-24 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), the trial court ordered the husband to pay two-thirds of the wife’s attorney’s fees, and we affirmed that ruling based on their financial circumstances, where the husband made more than two times that earned by th…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw