JOSE DEGRACIA, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Rico Correa v. State, 43 So. 3d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …t 929 (Hazouri, X, concurring). . In cases where the oral pronouncement does not match the written order of revocation, this court will normally require the trial court to amend its written order to match the oral pronouncement. See Green v. State, 19 So. 3d 449, 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). In this case, however, it is clear from the record and from the transcript of the proceedings that the trial court simply misspoke at the hearing. There was never any question that standard condition (7) was the condition un…
• Mata v. State, 31 So. 3d 257 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …r from the record that the trial court would have revoked probation and imposed the same sentence based solely upon the remaining counts, i.e., counts I, II, and VI.1 See, e.g., Green v. State, 23 So. 3d 820, 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Green v. State, 19 So. 3d 449, 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). As asserted by Mata in point III, remand is nonetheless required so that the trial court may enter a written order of revocation specifying the conditions violated. See, e.g., Green, 23 So. 3d at 821; Watts v. State, 688 So.…
• Gaddy v. State, 23 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …, 226 So. 2d at 462; Robinson v. State, 773 So. 2d 566, 567-68 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (striking three grounds for revocation of probation but affirming revocation where defendant violated condition requiring him to file monthly reports); Green v. State, 19 So. 3d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (holding that revocation of probation and sentence need not be reconsidered where one condition was not established but where competent, substantial evidence supported the trial court’s findings of violations of other conditions).…