WILLIAM P. MCCONNELL, APPELLANT,
v.
ESTATE OF STANVA V. FALLETTA, ET AL., APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2009-10-23
No. 5D07-4329
PALMER, ORFINGER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
20 So. 3d 451 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

See Price v. Abate, 9 So.3d 37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding that it is essential to validity of will or codicil for witnesses to sign in presence of testator and each other); see also § 733.502, Fla. Stat. (2008); Jordan v. Fehr, 902 So.2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Simpson v. Williamson, 611 So.2d 544 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • D.D.B. v. State, 109 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
    …ation ... of evidence is required as a condition precedent to its admissibility. The requirements of this section are satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”); Knight v. State, 20 So. 3d 451, 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). The identification of D.D.B.’s voice on the recording is helpful to the State’s case, but authentication would also require other predicate evidence, including that the recording was of a telephone call received and handled…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw