RAY K. DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
J. M. GOODWIN, APPELLEE
RAY K. DAVIS, APPELLANT,
J. M. GOODWIN, APPELLEE
100 So. 2d 75
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and PEARSON, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…d the exercise of such discretion will not be disturbed on appeal unless a clear showing is made that there was an abuse. E.g., Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Greenspun, 330 So. 2d 561, 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Stirling Music Co. v. Feilbach, 100 So. 2d 75, 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958). In exercising its discretion, the court is guided by established rules and principles of equity jurisprudence, in view of the particular facts presented in the case. Jennings, 360 So. 2d at 435; Muss v. City of Miami Beach, 3…
-
N. Dade Water Co. v. Adken Land Co., 114 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)…must have considered possible future pollution and its effect on the health and welfare of the surrounding property owners. See Roberts v. Peacock, 141 Fla. 214, 193 So. 548; Clark v. Kreidt, 145 Fla. 1, 199 So. 333; Davis v. Goodwin, Fla.App.1958, 100 So. 2d 75. The obvious purpose of a temporary injunction is to maintain a status quo of the subject matter of the suit pending a final determination of the cause. As the name would imply, a temporary injunction is not conclusive and the provisions of same m…
-
Robustiano Puga & Medmolds, Inc. v. Suave Shoe Corp., 374 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…unction enforcing, pendente lite, a so-called “non-competitive” agreement validated by Section 542.12(2), Florida Statutes (1975). Northwestern National Ins. Co. v. Green-spun, 330 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Stirling Music Co., Inc. v. Feilbach, 100 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958). Contrary to their contentions on appeal, the showing in the record that the covenant in question was being directly violated and that “from the nature of the act or the circumstances [the breach] cannot be readily, adequately, an…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence