JOHN FRANCES, APPELLANT,

v.

CHARLES D. CROSS, BAYOU BREEZE CONDOMINIUM, PENSACOLA EXECUTIVE HOUSE, INC., ET AL., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Santiago v. State, 70 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …label of “Snow” on the package of crack cocaine — to allow the state to introduce the details of the February 6 event to prove that the defendant knew of and had control and dominion over the crack cocaine seized on February 20. Cf. Parker v. State, 20 So. 3d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that two prior drug transactions were improperly admitted as collateral crimes evidence in a drug prosecution where the two prior transactions were not relevant to any material issue of fact). The standard of review for…
• Sabine v. State, 58 So. 3d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
  …context of the charged offenses, or describe the events leading up to the offenses. See Kates v. State, 41 So. 3d 1044, 1045-46 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (identifying possible bases for the admission of inextricably intertwined evidence); Parker v. State, 20 So. 3d 966, 970 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (same). The victim testified how Mr. Sabine sexually battered and molested her during the four-year charged time period. No explanation of prior or subsequent conduct was necessary for the jury to understand the evidence of t…
• Holmes v. State, 91 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …Here, the evidence of Appellant’s involvement with drugs and his previous contact with wit [*868] ness Rawlinson was separate from and extraneous to the altercation with Mr. Lloyd and the crimes with which Appellant was charged. See Parker v. State, 20 So. 3d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (reversing convictions for possession of drugs; evidence of prior drug transactions was not relevant to or inextricably intertwined with charged drug crimes). The evidence was not necessary to adequately describe the shooting or t…