ABEDELKADER DAWUDI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the denial of jail time credit for pre-transfer incarceration but reversed and remanded regarding probation time credit, requiring the trial court to either award 147 days of credit or provide a conclusive refutation.
A trial court must either award jail time credit for probation time served or provide a conclusive refutation in the record, but pre-transfer jail time credit may be pursued through administrative remedies and mandamus.
[1] A trial court must either grant jail time credit for probation time served or provide a conclusive refutation in the record, rather than summarily denying such a motion w…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDawudi sought jail time credit for thirty-two days in jail before prison transfer and 147 days spent on probation following his original sentence.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Credit For Time Served On Probation cases and more on FLexlaw
Abedelkader Dawudi appeals a trial court order summarily denying his motion for jail time credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of his claim insofar as he sought credit for thirty-two days spent in jail before his transfer to prison after the original sentence was imposed, without prejudice to his right to exhaust all administrative recourse as to that claim, and to then seek mandamus relief in the circuit court if still not satisfied. See generally Shelton v. State, 942 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
We reverse the trial court’s summary denial of this motion insofar as Dawudi sought credit for 147 days spent on probation, however. See Waters v. State, 662 So.2d 332 (Fla.1995); Hughes v. State, 927 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). The State filed a response in this Court agreeing that the trial court erred on this point. We remand to the trial court to either award the requested credit of 147 days or to attach portions of the record to a new order of denial that conclusively refutes Dawudi’s claim of entitlement to credit for time previously served on probation.
AJfimed in Part; Reversed in PaH and Remanded.
TAYLOR, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Waters v. State, 662 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1995)
- Hughes v. State, 927 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
- Wallace v. State, 942 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
- Shelton v. State, 942 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)