S.D.J., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
S.D.J., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
21 So. 3d 140
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
In this appeal from a juvenile disposition, the State concedes that the trial court erred by assessing costs of prosecution. See D.A. v. State, 11 So.3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes, does not authorize courts to impose costs of prosecution on a juvenile adjudicated delinquent). Accordingly, we remand with directions that these costs be stricken. In all other respects, the adjudications of delinquency and disposition are affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
MONACO, C.J., LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
F.W. v. State, 29 So. 3d 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…PER CURIAM. In this appeal from a juvenile disposition, the State concedes that the trial court [*429] erred by assessing costs of prosecution. See S.D.J. v. State, 21 So. 3d 140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); D.A. v. State, 11 So. 3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes, does not authorize courts to impose costs of prosecution on juvenile adjudicated delinquent). Accordingly, we remand with direct…
Authorities Cited
- D.A. v. State, 11 So. 3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)