CHRISTOPHER J. RAHAIM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2009-12-02
No. 2D08-4872
DAVIS and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
21 So. 3d 922 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.

KELLY, Judge.

Christopher Rahaim appeals his judgment and sentence for sexual battery. We affirm his judgment and sentence without discussion but reverse the restitution order and remand for a new restitution hearing.

In imposing sentence on Rahaim, the trial court set a later hearing to determine restitution. Before the restitution hearing took place, Rahaim filed a notice of appeal. The trial court then conducted the hearing and entered the restitution order. Rahaim contends, and the State concedes, that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the restitution order after the notice of appeal had been filed. See Williams v. State, 19 So.3d 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). Accordingly, we reverse and remand to allow the trial court to reimpose restitution. See L’Heureux v. State, 968 So.2d 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

DAVIS and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • J.L. v. State, 50 So. 3d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
    …becomes employed. Additionally, as the trial court may not impose restitution once a notice of appeal has been filed, that order, as corrected pursuant to this opinion, needs to be re-entered after the conclusion of this appeal. See Rahaim v. State, 21 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); L’Heureux v. State, 968 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Affirmed and remanded with directions.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw