MAURICE DONNELL WARREN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MAURICE DONNELL WARREN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
23 So. 3d 218
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. The issue of the appropriate amount of restitution was not properly preserved for appellate review, and no fundamental error is presented. Mapp v. State, 18 So.3d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).
KAHN, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rivera v. State, 34 So. 3d 207 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…at the hearing when the trial court imposed the amount of restitution. Id. Cases citing Mapp have determined that errors regarding the sufficiency of evidence to support restitution amounts did not constitute fundamental error. See Warren v. State, 23 So. 3d 218, 219 (Fla. 1st. DCA 2009); Pilon v. State, 20 So. 3d 992, 993 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). In addition, the Florida Supreme Court has previously stated, “We conclude that an unpreserved error in the assessment of costs cannot be considered a serious, patent…
Authorities Cited
- Mapp v. State, 18 So. 3d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)