RAY LEGGETT, APPELLANT,
v.
AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, APPELLEE
RAY LEGGETT, APPELLANT,
AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, APPELLEE
23 So. 3d 227
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The order on appeal which denied appellant’s request for a formal administrative hearing is quashed. The cause is remanded to the Agency for further proceedings consistent with Moreland v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 19 So.3d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) and the order of the United States District Court in Washington v. DeBeaugrine, 658 F.Supp.2d 1332 (N.D.Fla.2009).
KAHN, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. v. City OF Port ST. Lucie, 69 So. 3d 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…t contract bids should not be interfered with by the courts, absent a showing of dishonesty, illegality, fraud, oppression or misconduct.” Sutron Corp. v. Lake County Water Auth., 870 So. 2d 930, 932 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). In Solares v. City of Miami, 23 So. 3d 227, 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), the purpose of appellants’ emergency motion for temporary injunction was to prevent the county’s sale of bonds until the lawsuit could be decided. On appeal, the Third District found that because the bonds had been sold, the…
-
Bloch v. DEL REY, 208 So. 3d 189 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…hich injunctive relief was sought are now moot. Even if we were to conclude that the trial court erred in granting judgment on the pleadings on Count III, a reversal and remand would be futile under these circumstances. See Solares v. City of Miami, 23 So. 3d 227 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Rubin v. Addison Reserve Country Club, Inc., 126 So. 3d 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). We therefore decline to reach the merits of this claim and dismiss this portion of the appeal.7 Turning to the declaratory and injunc-tive relief…
-
Rubin v. Addison Reserve Country Club, Inc., 126 So. 3d 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…injunction, however, the ap-pellee’s representative testified without objection that the modifications were complete. Therefore, with no construction to enjoin, the relief requested by the temporary injunction was moot. See Solares v. City of Miami, 23 So. 3d 227, 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). While appellants cite to Velickovich v. Ricci, 391 So. 2d 258, 259 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), as authority for the court order for the removal of the construction, Velickovich involved a final, mandatory in [*1190] junction, not a…
Authorities Cited
- Geraud L. Moreland v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 19 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
- Washington v. DeBeaugrine, 658 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (N.D. Fla. 2009)