STEPHEN VECSEY, APPELLANT,
v.
JULIA VECSEY, APPELLEE
STEPHEN VECSEY, APPELLANT,
JULIA VECSEY, APPELLEE
100 So. 2d 437
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order allowing alimony, counsel fees and suit money pendente lite. When the statutory basis for such an order is established, an appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the Chancellor unless a clear abuse of discretion is made to appear. Floyd v. Floyd, 91 Fla. 910, 108 So. 896; McAllister v. McAllister, 140 Fla. 207, 191 So. 303.
The briefs and appendices failing to establish an abuse of discretion on the part of the Chancellor, the order is affirmed.
Affirmed.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State of Fla. ex rel. Alfred Eichenbaum v. Cochran, 114 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 1959)…, if any, must come from the law-making body, not the courts. We are not here confronted by a special zoning variance privilege granted to a particular owner because of an alleged hardship. Harlem, Jr., Inc. v. Mount Sinai Baptist Church, Fla.App., 100 So. 2d 437. Finding as we do, on the basis of the record presented, that Ordinance 58-6 adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Dade County was within their power to adopt and that it allowed the issuance of the [*801] license under attack, it natural…
-
Johnson v. Vill. OF Va. Gardens, 107 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)…s would be rendered unlawful by valid ordinance forbidding the location of such business within 1,500 feet of a church, and public school. The summary judgment was properly entered. Cf. Harlem, Jr., Inc., v. Mount Sinai Baptist Church, Fla.App.1958, 100 So. 2d 437. Affirmed. HORTON, Acting Chief Judge, PEARSON, J., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Associate Judge, concur.…
-
Vecsey v. Vecsey, 115 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)…ch a finding is not for an appellate court to make where there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the chancellor’s finding.7 Affirmed. HORTON, C. J., and CARROLL, CHAS., J., concur. . A prior appearance of this cause will be found at 100 So. 2d 437. . Bule 1.21, F.R.C.P., SO F.S.A. . Rule 1.24, F.B.C.P., 30 F.S.A. . Buie 1.21(d) (2), Florida Buies of Civil Procedure. This rule is identical with Buie 26(d) (2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Merchants Motor Freight v. Downing,…
Authorities Cited
- Floyd v. Addie Hunton Floyd, 91 Fla. 910 (Fla. 1926)
- McAllister v. McAllister, 140 Fla. 207 (Fla. 1939)