JIMMY HALL, APPELLANT,
v.
PRO ACCESS, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2009-11-18
No. 3D09-1525
Before GERSTEN, SUAREZ and LAGOA, JJ.
26 So. 3d 13 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2009) Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Jimmy Hall (“Hall”) appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The plaintiff, Pro Access, Inc., did not establish sufficient facts to bring this action within Florida’s long arm statute. See § 48.193, Fla. Stat. (2007). The plaintiff also did not show that exercising personal jurisdiction over Hall comports with due process. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989). Thus, the trial court should have granted Hall’s motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Hall’s motion to dismiss, and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • City OF Tavares & Gallagher Bassett Serv., Inc. v. Harper, 230 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
    …82 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (holding that pre-employment physical examination finding claimant fit for duty but noting a diagnosis of hypertension precluded presumption of compensability of hypertension under section 112.18(1)); Miami-Dade Cty. v. Davis, 26 So. 3d 13, 17-18 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (holding that section 112.18(1) presumption was precluded where relevant pre-employment physical revealed claimant suffered from heart disease). Here, Claimant’s 2007 pre-employment physical examination report listed a si…
  • Volusia Cnty. Fire Servs. & Cnty. Risk Mgmt. v. Taaffe, 27 So. 3d 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
    …the beginning of a firefighters’ career;” and it is immaterial that Claimant’s pre-employment physical with the Employer revealed hypertension. The JCC erred in ignoring Claimant’s pre-em-ployment physical with the employer. See Miami-Dade v. Davis, 26 So. 3d 13 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). The JCC’s order finding Claimant’s condition to be compensable is reversed. We remand for entry of an order consistent with this opinion. WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.…
  • Holcombe v. City of Naples/Johns E. Co., Inc. (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw