SAMUEL GARDNER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
SAMUEL GARDNER, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
26 So. 3d 33
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).
WEBSTER, DAVIS, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Carry, Inc. v. Univ. OF N. Fla., 133 So. 3d 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…96 (Fla.2011). Even when the court determines the legislature intended something not expressed in the wording, the judiciary lacks the authority under organic law to depart from the plain meaning of an unambiguous statute. See Johnson v. Gulf Cnty., 26 So. 3d 33, 41 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (quoting Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach Erosion Control Dist., 604 So. 2d 452, 454 (Fla.1992)). Thus here, it must be presumed that the legislature intended to grant the power to issue waivers solely to “school districts” not…
-
Gardner v. State, 179 So. 3d 458 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…court to challenge this judgment and sentence. This court has already dismissed three, of his petitions for writ of habeas corpus under Baker,- most recently just last year. See Gardner v. Crews, 135 So. 3d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Gardner v. State, 26 So. 3d 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Gardner v. State, 991 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Accordingly, we ordered petitioner, to show cause, why he • should not be prohibited from future pro se filings challenging this judgment and sentence. See State v. Spencer,…
Authorities Cited
- Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004)