NATHANIEL GRAHAM, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Mango Hill Condo. Ass'n 12 Inc., 54 So. 3d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
  …ecause the same circumstances exist here, we reverse the order compelling appraisal and remand for an evidentiary hearing on whether Mango Hill sufficiently complied with the policy’s post-loss requirements. See Sunshine State Ins. Co. v. Corridori, 28 So. 3d 129, 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (confirming that where an insured cooperates to some degree or explains non-compliance with a policy’s post-loss requirements, a fact question is presented which should be resolved on an evidentiary hearing); Citizens Proper…
• Sunshine State Ins. Co. v. Rawlins, 34 So. 3d 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …rguments in allowing the trial court to make the determination as to whether or not to allow the appraisal and coverage processes to move forward on a dual track basis. In addition, we do not find that Sunshine State Insurance Company v. Corridori, 28 So. 3d 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) is on point because in Corridori, the insured did not provide the requested examinations under oath and sworn proof of losses as requested by the insurer. The trial court in Corridori took no evidence and did not consider the iss…
• People's Tr. Ins. Co. v. Tracey, 251 So. 3d 931 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)

Authorities Cited

• Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004)