JOE SMITHWICK, IV, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOE SMITHWICK, IV, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
28 So. 3d 152
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla.1974).
MONACO, C.J., PALMER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Second Sunrise Inv. Corp., 56 So. 3d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…d documents an offer to settle for a specified sum and an unaccepted counter offer for payment of that sum from a specified fund. As the record confirms, there was no “meeting of the minds” and thus, no resulting agreement. See Seawell v. Hargarten, 28 So. 3d 152, 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (concluding “a misunderstanding cannot result in agreement or to a ‘meeting of the minds’ required to form a contract.”); see also Pan Am. W., Ltd. v. Cardinal Commercial Dev., LLC, 50 So. 3d 68, 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (citin…
-
Pack v. Wiechert, 285 So. 3d 1031 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Lynch v. State, 293 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1974)