KARLA MARADRIAGA, APPELLANT,
v.
7-ELEVEN AND KEMPER GROUP, APPELLEES
KARLA MARADRIAGA, APPELLANT,
7-ELEVEN AND KEMPER GROUP, APPELLEES
29 So. 3d 440
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Upon review of Appellant’s response to this Court’s show cause order entered January 12, 2010, we GRANT Appellees’ motion to dismiss and DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). See also Fla. Retail Fed’n Self-Insured, Fund v. Quintero, 909 So.2d 332, 333 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
LEWIS, THOMAS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Maradriaga v. 7-Eleven & Kemper Grp., 35 So. 3d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…hat a settlement did occur between the parties, then that ruling would be a final adjudication on all issues.” Because the JCC’s order was neither a final order nor a non-final appeal-able order, the appeal was dismissed. See Maradriaga v. 7-Eleven, 29 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). In their response to the show cause order issued on March 10, Appellant’s attorneys simply expanded on the previously stated reason as to why the JCC’s order should be viewed as final, and advised they relied on a per curiam af…
Authorities Cited
- Fla. Retail Fed'n Self-Insured Fund-Summit Claims Ctr. v. Quintero, 909 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)