NORMA QUINTANA, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, ET AL., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2010-03-10
No. 3D09-1444
Before GERSTEN and SHEPHERD, JJ„ and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
29 So. 3d 446 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Topics
Timeliness Of Appeal

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Timeliness Of Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, J.

SHEPHERD, J.

On October 24, 2008, a notice of determination, holding Norma Quintana was disqualified from receiving benefits and was overpaid in excess of seven hundred dollars, was mailed to the claimant with instructions for taldng a timely appeal from agency action. Since the appeal was not filed until January 12, 2009, well beyond the twenty-day statutory time limit, it was dismissed by the appeals referee. The Unemployment Appeals Commission affirmed. As nothing in the record supports a finding that the claimant’s notice was not provided to her in a timely manner, and Florida law does not permit good cause exceptions to the dismissal rule, we are bound to affirm the order of the Appeals Commission below. See Robinson v. Sun Bank & Trust Co., 685 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Riegler v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 633 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Leon v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 476 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Green v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 34 So. 3d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009); Quintana v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 29 So. 3d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).…
  • Rostran v. The Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Holiday CVS, LLC., 83 So. 3d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
    …WELLS, C.J. Affirmed. See Quintana v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n 29 So. 3d 446, 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (“As nothing in the record supports a finding that the claimant’s notice was not provided to her in a timely manner, and Florida law does not permit good cause exceptions to the dismissal rule, we are bound to affirm the orde…
  • Perez v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n, 116 So. 3d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
    …he order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission denying relief because review of the adverse order of the appeals referee was untimely filed is affirmed. See § 443.151(3)(c) Fla. Stat. (2013); Quintana v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 29 So. 3d 446 (Fla 3d DCA 2010). Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw