ANTHONY SUDOL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2010-02-12
No. 5D09-1295
MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
29 So. 3d 1155 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Although the appellant, Anthony Sudol, fashions this appeal as an appeal from a judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court, it appears that Mr. Sudol is actually attempting to appeal an order under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) granting a motion for reduction and modification of a sentence. As such an order is not appealable, we dismiss this appeal. See Jackson v. State, 936 So.2d 775 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Hunker v. State, 397 So.2d 934 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Moreover, if this had been an appeal from a judgment and sentence, we would have affirmed inasmuch as the sentence issued conforms to the plea bargain and is legal.

DISMISSED.

MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Spencer v. EMC Mortg. Corp., 97 So. 3d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
    …g on someone who already knows of the document’s existence should relieve that individual of the consequences which would inevitably flow from his failure to establish, at any time or in any way, that he was entitled to relief. See Grainger v. Wald, 29 So. 3d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (holding service of notice to creditors upon creditor’s personal injury attorney instead of probate attorney was effective insofar as creditor had actual notice of limitations period for filing claim); Dep’t of Highway Safety & Mo…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw