THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
TERRANCE MCCRAY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The State of Florida appealed a trial court's downward departure sentencing that placed the defendant on probation despite scoring 21 months in prison under the sentencing guidelines. The appellate court reversed, holding that a trial court cannot impose a downward departure sentence over the State's objection without providing either written reasons or oral pronouncements on the record supporting the departure.
The trial court erred in imposing a downward departure sentence over the State's objection without filing written reasons or orally pronouncing valid reasons on the record. When a trial court makes a plea offer that constitutes a downward departure and the State objects, the trial court must provide clear and convincing reasons for the departure.
[1] A trial court must provide written reasons for a downward departure sentence from the sentencing guidelines when the State objects.
[2] A downward departure sentence may be affirmed if the trial court orally pronounces a valid basis for the sentence on the record, even without written findings.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[QUOTE REDACTED — failed verbatim audit (paraphrase, not verbatim). See original_text for the text as originally displayed.]”
Establishes the legal standard that downward departures require either written or oral reasons on the record
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTerrance McCray and a co-defendant were charged with burglary of an unoccupied dwelling and criminal mischief. McCray entered a nolo contendere plea a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clear And Convincing Reasons cases and more on FLexlaw
The State of Florida appeals the defendant Terrance McCray’s downward departure sentence. We reverse, finding that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence that was below the sentencing guidelines, over the State’s objection, without filing written reasons for the downward departure and without any orally stated reasons for a downward departure.
McCray and his co-defendant were charged with burglary of an unoccupied dwelling and criminal mischief. He pled nolo contendere and scored out to twenty-one (21) months in state prison.
At the sentencing hearing, the State objected to McCray being placed on probation because he had scored twenty-one months in state prison. In addition, the State conveyed to the trial court that one of the victims in the case, as well as the victim’s husband, objected to McCray being placed on probation. The State further objected to McCray being placed on probation because he had another open misdemeanor case, resisting an officer without violence. As such, the State argued, McCray was not an appropriate candidate for probation.
In reply, the defense argued that the co-defendant in this case received probation as a youthful offender. The defense further argued that the community would be protected if McCray was placed on probation. The State pointed out to the trial court that the co-defendant was substantially younger than McCray.
The trial court thereafter withheld adjudication and sentenced McCray to two years probation, one-hundred community sendee hours, participation in a jobs program, and restitution in the amount of $205. The State again objected. McCray entered his plea and was sentenced accordingly. The State now appeals.
We agree with the State that the trial court erred when it imposed a sentence, after a plea offer, that constituted a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines, over the State’s objection, without filing written reasons for the downward departure and without any orally stated reasons for the downward departure. When a trial court enters a sentence containing a dowirward departure from the sentencing guidelines, the trial court must provide valid written reasons for doing so. *873 State v. Green, 932 So.2d 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). If the trial court does not do so, however, a downward departure sentence may be affirmed if the trial court orally pronounces on the record a valid basis for the sentence. Pease v. State, 712 So.2d 374 (Fla.1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(27)(A).
In McCray’s case, the trial court did not render written findings. Moreover, a review of the January 13, 2009 plea and sentencing transcript does not indicate that any orally announced basis for the sentence was given.
A plea agreement between the State and a defendant is a valid reason for a departure from the sentencing guidelines, but if the State objects to a plea offer made by the trial court to a defendant, the trial court cannot make such an offer unless it provides clear and convincing reasons for its departure. State v. Johnson, 512 So.2d 1116, 1116-17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Accordingly, the plea is vacated and the case is remanded so that McCray may either withdraw his plea or be resentenced within the sentencing guidelines. Franquiz v. State, 682 So.2d 536 (Fla.1996).
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Severino Marron, 106 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…we find that the trial court departed from its statutory obligations, we reverse and remand. I. It is axiomatic that a trial court choosing to depart from the sentencing guidelines must provide valid written reasons for doing so. State v. McCray, 31 So. 3d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). The legislature has provided numerous avenues for complying with this requirement. The court may either annotate the scoresheet, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(27)(A), file written reasons within seven days after sentencing, id.; § 921…
-
State v. Severino Marron, 111 So. 3d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…we find that the trial court departed from its statutory obligations, we reverse and remand. I. It is axiomatic that a trial court choosing to depart from the sentencing guidelines must provide valid written reasons for doing so. State v. McCray, 31 So. 3d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). The legislature has provided numerous avenues for complying with this requirement. The court may either annotate the scoresheet, Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(27)(a), file written reasons within seven days after sentencing, id.-, § 92…
-
Smith v. State, 125 So. 3d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…court’s ruling will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.”). However, it was error for the trial court to impose a downward departure sentence over the State’s objections without stating valid reasons for the departure. See State v. McCray, 31 So. 3d 871, 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); see also State v. Barnes, 753 So. 2d 605, 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and sentence and remand for the trial court to allow Smith to choose either to withdraw his plea or be resentenced within…
Authorities Cited
- Pease v. State, 712 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 1997)
- Franquiz v. State, 682 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1996)
- State v. Johnson, 512 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- State v. Green, 932 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)