ANDREW STRINGER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANDREW STRINGER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
31 So. 3d 946
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the order denying return of the property. We note, however, that the legal proceeding that justified delay of the return of this property is now concluded. Thus, our affirmance is without prejudice to Mr. Stringer’s right now to seek return of the $884 that was seized from him during an arrest that resulted in a violation of probation, but did not result in any new conviction. The transcript of the hearing on the violation of probation contains evidence that $300 was wired to Mr. Stringer by his girlfriend prior to this arrest and that this money was intended to be used for a specific lawful purpose.
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. State, 93 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…pecifically, the trial court should order a response from appellant’s attorneys “to determine what, if anything, must be provided to [appellant] and likewise to determine what is available if [appellant] wishes to purchase a copy.” Raymond v. State, 31 So. 3d 946, 948 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Unless appellant’s attorneys show cause as to why relief should not be granted, the trial court shall grant the petition to the extent that the petition requests transcripts or other record documents obtained on appellant’s…
-
DeGREGORIO v. State, 205 So. 3d 841 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…09 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (citing Polley v. Gardner, 98 So. 3d 648, 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)). A court-appointed attorney has a legal duty to return a client’s personal property and transcripts prepared on his behalf at public expense. Raymond v. State, 31 So. 3d 946, 947-48 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing Potts, 869 So. 2d at 1225). The defendant does not have to specifically identify these documents in his petition. Id. at 947. When the petition and response create an issue as to whether counsel possessed the recor…
-
Wharen v. State, 170 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…e what other requested documents it has in its possession that were not obtained or prepared at public expense, and advise as to the cost of copying and providing them, should Appellant desire and have the means of paying for them. Raymond v. State, 31 So. 3d 946, 948 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).…