ARTURO M. ORTUNO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ARTURO M. ORTUNO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
32 So. 3d 121
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Jones v. State, 898 So.2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (applying Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2) to preserve error regarding lack of written order that specified trial court’s findings on probation violations).
FULMER, NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hines v. State, 125 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…trial court only found two violations of condition 15. However, this issue was not preserved for appellate review by an objection in the trial court or by the filing of a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Ortuno v. State, 32 So. 3d 121, 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Evett v. State, 947 So. 2d 662, 662-63 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Jones v. State, 898 So. 2d 209, 209-10 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Jelks v. State, 770 So. 2d 183, 185-86 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Affirmed. MORRIS and SLEET, JJ., Concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Jones v. State, 898 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)