LINWOOD JAMES IVEY, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Thomas v. State, 63 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …2d 205, 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)). However, “[t]here are no exact ‘magic words’ or phrases which must be used by the defense in order to necessitate the [Richardson ] inquiry; only the fact that a discovery request has not been met.” Jones v. State, 32 So. 3d 706, 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (citing Smith v. State, 7 So. 3d 473, 506 (Fla.2009)). “Once a trial court has notice of a discovery violation, the court must conduct a Richardson hearing to inquire about the circumstances surrounding the state’s violation…
• Lowe v. State, 259 So. 3d 23 (Fla. 2018)
  …s no explanation of how the diagram could have "materially hindered the defendant's trial preparation or strategy." Smith , 7 So. 3d at 506 (quoting Scipio v. State , 928 So. 2d 1138, 1150 (Fla. 2006) ). The only case cited by Lowe, Jones v. State , 32 So. 3d 706, 710-11 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), is wholly distinguishable, as it involved the late disclosure by the State, in the middle of the trial, of a threat allegedly made by the defendant against the victim. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in all…
• Cliff Berry, Inc. v. State, 116 So. 3d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
  …ailed to request a Richardson hearing. “There are no exact ‘magic words’ or phrases which must be used by the defense in order to necessi [*414] tate the [Richardson] inquiry; only the fact that a discovery request has not been met.” Jones v. State, 32 So. 3d 706, 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (quoting Smith v. State, 7 So. 3d 473, 506 (Fla.2009)); see also C.D.B. v. State, 662 So. 2d 738, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Brown v. State, 640 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Raffone v. State, 483 So. 2d 761, 764 (Fla. 4th D…

Authorities Cited

• Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004)