IN RE ESTATE OF DAVID A. FISHER, DECEASED. SAMUEL FISHER ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
VERNON W. TURNER ET AL., APPELLEES
IN RE ESTATE OF DAVID A. FISHER, DECEASED. SAMUEL FISHER ET AL., APPELLANTS,
VERNON W. TURNER ET AL., APPELLEES
101 So. 2d 18
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on the authority of Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Sauls, 98 Fla. 339, 123 So. 780, and Brodgon v. McBride, Fla.1954, 75 So.2d 770.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Amendments TO THE Fla. Rules OF Civil Procedure (TWO Year Cycle) & Fla. Rule of App. Procedure 9.110, 858 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 2003)…wered and conversely if a denial is made to part of a requested admission, the part denied and the part admitted should be specified. The decisions of the Federal courts are authorities in determining the application of this rule. Wider v. Carraway, 101 So. 2d 18 (D.C.A. 2d 1958). As a matter of practice, the date for serving answers to requests for admissions should be designated and this should be not less than 20 [now 30] days; however, the request should designate a definite time for answering. See Camp…
-
Samuel B. Goodstone et ux. v. Shamblen, 141 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…tional Investment Co., Fla.App. 1958, 101 So. 2d 15. A reading of that case discloses that such a conclusion on the part of defendants here could only have been drawn from a quotation taken from Pome-roy, Equity Jurisprudence, appearing as dictum at 101 So. 2d 18, as follows: “ ‘ * * * As in suits for a reformation alone * * * the evidence must be of the clearest and most convincing nature; the burden of proof is on the plaintiff, and he must prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt. It is not sufficient me…
Authorities Cited
- The Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Sauls, 98 Fla. 339 (Fla. 1929)
- Brodgon v. McBRIDE, 75 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1954)